‘He does not deserve to be left behind’: Tearful sister of last US hostage held by Taliban begs Biden to ‘get my brother home’ as America withdraws from Afghanistan
- Mark Frerichs was kidnapped in January 2020 from Kabul while doing construction contract work
- He is believed to be held by the Haggani network, an offshoot of the Taliban
- Sister Charlene Cakora has begged President Biden to bring her brother home
- As the U.S. withdraws troops from the country, Frerichs’ family fear that the veteran could be left behind
The sister of the last American hostage being held by the Taliban has begged President Biden to ‘bring her brother home’ as the final US troops pack up and prepare to leave Afghanistan.
Mark Frerichs, a 58-year-old Navy veteran from Lombard, Illinois, was kidnapped in January 2020 from Kabul while doing construction contract work. He is believed to be held by the Haggani network, an offshoot of the Taliban.
But now, as the U.S. withdraws troops from the country, Frerichs’ family fear that the veteran could be left behind.
His sister Charlene Cakora on Tuesday begged President Biden to do ‘everything he can’ to bring her brother home amid fears of chaos in Afghanistan if American soldiers leave.
Charlene Cakora on Tuesday begged President Biden to do ‘everything he can’ to bring her brother home amid fears of chaos in Afghanistan if American soldiers leave
Mark Frerichs, a 58-year-old Navy veteran, was abducted in January 2020 while doing construction contract work in Afghanistan
Cakora told ABC News in an emotional interview: ‘President Biden, oh please do everything you can to bring my brother home’
‘You have the power to bring my brother home, please get my brother home safely. We are relying on you,’ Cakora said with tears in her eyes.
‘He’s a good man. He deserves better. He does not deserve to be left behind. He’s an American citizen. And I know that you would not leave an American citizen behind, so please, I beg you, do everything you can to get my brother home.’
With US troops preparing to have left Afghanistan by July Fourth, Cakora said that ‘it is almost too late now’ to hope for a negotiation or hostage rescue mission to return her brother to the US.
Frerichs’ advocates have expressed concern that the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan could make it harder to get him home, leaving the U.S. without leverage to demand his release or without the intelligence needed to pinpoint his whereabouts in the country for a rescue operation.
Cakora’s pleas come as a US intelligence assessment found the Afghan government could fall within six months of the departure of remaining U.S. troops as the Taliban makes a resurgence.
Cakora added: ‘How are they sleeping at night knowing that they left a US citizen behind? A US veteran.
‘I don’t think anybody can come home with their head held high until every stone has been turned.’
Asked earlier Friday about Frerichs, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said President Biden would continue his efforts to bring home detained Americans, without naming Frerichs.
Psaki said: ‘The president’s message is that he will continue to fight every day of his presidency to bring Americans home who are detained overseas, whether it’s in Afghanistan or any other country around the world.
‘We will have a diplomatic presence on the ground, we will continue to work closely with the government with security support, humanitarian support, and there needs to be continued political process, ongoing negotiations.’
Frerich is believed to be held by the Haqqani network, and offshoot of the Taliban
Later on Friday, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani said that his government would do what it can to help secure the release of Frerichs, though he said President Biden didn’t press him on the matter during a White House meeting.
U.S. officials have said Frerichs’ captivity has been raised during negotiations with the Taliban, but they have not revealed anything about his suspected whereabouts or disclosed details of those discussions.
Asked whether Frerichs came up during a conversation earlier in the afternoon with Biden, Ghani said it did not. But he said ‘we will do everything in our power’ to help facilitate Frerichs’ release.
As the U.S. military completes its withdrawal from Afghanistan, with each base closing down every week and the Taliban launching an offensive against the government forces, Cakora said she and her husband Chris feel that ‘our leverage is pretty much gone right now’.
President Joe Biden met with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani at the White House on June 25. Ghani said that his government would do what it can to help secure the release of Frerichs, though he said President Biden didn’t press him on the matter during the White House meeting
In a matter of days, the last US soldiers will have departed Bagram Airfield, the heart of American military power in Afghanistan for two decades.
It was initially a symbol of the US drive to avenge the 9/11 attacks and then of its struggle for a way through the ensuing war with the Taliban.
‘We can’t lose hope and we have to be strong for Mark, but it’s hard,’ said Cakora, adding that she has spent a lot of time gardening to pass the time.
‘I do a lot of weed pulling and I take all the frustration out with that,’ she said. ‘And I try not to watch the news too much, as far as that. But it’s been really tough the past month due to the fact that our troops are coming home.’
For the past few weeks, American diplomats have focused their attention on speaking to Pakistan, whose intelligence services have a close relationship with the Haggani network, an offshoot of the Taliban, which is holding Frerichs hostage.
The Pakistani government told ABC News that there is ‘no evidence’ of the US veteran being held captive in their country but said they would help to return him to his family.
AMERICANS WITHDRAW: Within days, the last US soldiers will depart Bagram (pictured: US troops load up helicopter onto a C-17 Globesmaster at Bagram on June 16). They are leaving what probably everyone connected to the base, whether American, British or Afghan, considers a strained legacy
‘They’re not using the right methods,’ Cakora said, as she became frustrated that it has taken over a year to involve Pakistan in the relief efforts. ‘There’s capabilities, there are stones unturned I firmly believe, and I don’t think anybody can come home with their head held high until every stone has been turned.’
‘I just want to tell anybody, the people who are holding Mark, I just want to let you know that Mark’s my brother and I want him home safe,’ she said. ‘And wouldn’t you want your brother home if you were in the same situation?’
Speaking of President Biden’s efforts, Cakora added: ‘I think I feel that if they leave a man behind that served this country for six years, I would think that, how could they sleep at night, you know?
‘They’re pretty cold if they’re not doing their job, because that’s their job.’
Roughly 650 U.S. troops are expected to remain in Afghanistan to provide security for diplomats after the main American military force completes its withdrawal, which is set to be largely done in the next two weeks, U.S. officials told The Associated Press.
American officials have said the entire pullout of US troops will most likely be completely finished by July 4.
It comes as the last US solders are set to depart from Bagram Airfield in just a matter of days.
The Afghan military will then take over Bagram as part of its continuing fight against the Taliban – and against what many in the country fear will be a new eruption of chaos.
US forces load a UH-60L Blackhawk helicopter into a C-17 Globemaster III in support of the Resolute Support retrograde mission, the withdrawal from Bagram, on June 16, 2021
The US fortress is 40 miles north of the capital, Kabul. It was the heart of American military might in Afghanistan, a sprawling mini-city behind fences and blast walls
As the withdrawal date for the US troops approaches, thousands of Afghan translators now face being left stranded because they haven’t yet been accepted for a Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) into America.
Up to 18,000 translators and interpreters are under constant fear of deadly attacks from the Taliban and have been run out of their homes because of their support for the American government over the last 20 years.
It has cost the US military 2,312 lives and $816bn, according to the Department of Defense.
Bill Roggio, senior fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, said Bagram’s closure is a ‘major symbolic and strategic victory’ for the Taliban.
‘If the Taliban is able to take control of the base, it will serve as anti-U.S. propaganda fodder for years to come,’ said Roggio who is also editor of the foundation’s Long War Journal. It would also be a military windfall.
On Friday, President Biden met with Afghan leaders at the White House where he doubled down on the ongoing U.S. military withdrawal amid an uncertain future for that nation.
‘The partnership between Afghanistan and the United States is not ending,’ he assured. ‘It’s going to be sustained.’
‘And, you know, our troops may be leaving but support for Afghanistan is not ending,’ the president added.
President Joe Biden will double down on the ongoing U.S. military withdrawal in his meeting with leaders of Aghanistan
The meeting also comes as Biden promised to move the 18,000 Afghans who helped the U.S. war effort and are awaiting visas to a safe location amid fears of Taliban revenge.
The president vowed on Thursday that Afghans who helped the U.S. military ‘are not going to be left behind.’
More than 18,000 are stuck trying to apply for Special Immigrant Visas, with the U.S.’s involvement in Afghanistan ending in 80 days. If left in Afghanistan, those allied with the U.S. could be murdered by the Taliban.
The administration intends to carry out the evacuation later this summer, likely in August, before its September deadline to withdraw U.S. forces, a senior administration official told the Associated Press.
‘They’re going to come,’ Biden said on Thursday. ‘We’ve already begun the process. Those who helped us are not going to be left behind.’
Meanwhile, from Afghanistan’s southern badlands of Helmand and Kandahar to the country’s northern border with Tajikistan, the Taliban are on the march.
TALIBAN GAINS NEW GROUND: A lighting offensive by the Taliban which began in May has seen the group take control of vast swathes of rural Afghanistan and battle their way to the doorstep of major cities such as Kandahar, Herat and Kabul – with attacks on them expected soon
Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Friday that Washington was assessing whether the Taliban was serious about ending the conflict in Afghanistan, and that trying to take back the country by force was not consistent with peace efforts.
The peace process has stalled as Afghan security forces battle a Taliban spring offensive that threatens several provincial capitals. Ethnic militias has been mobilized to help government troops.
‘We are looking very carefully at the security on the ground in Afghanistan and we’re also looking very hard at whether the Taliban is, at all, serious about a peaceful resolution of the conflict,’ Blinken told a joint news conference with France’s foreign minister.
‘But actions that would try take the country by force are, of course, totally inconsistent with finding a peaceful resolution.’
The Pentagon estimates the Taliban now control 81 of Afghanistan’s 419 district centers.
In a lightning offensive which started in May as US and NATO forces withdrew, the terror group and its jihadist fighters have captured vast swathes of countryside which has brought them to the doorstep of major cities including Kandahar, Herat and Kabul.
A major offensive to capture them is expected this summer, with the Afghan government scrambling to ready its rag-tag forces while recruiting the help of tribal warlords in the hopes of holding them off.
That has raised the spectre of a vicious and bloody civil war similar to the one that engulfed the country in the 1990s, killing tens of thousands and bringing the Taliban to power in the first place.
If the group emerges victorious again, it will hand them back control of the country in what The Times says would be ‘the greatest jihadist victory since the Soviets quit’ – undoing two decades of western intervention along with it.
The fight has come to Afghan forces suddenly and on all fronts, with troops complaining they are outnumbered, outgunned, under-paid and exhausted after more than 20 years of fighting in what is often called ‘the long war.’
Militiamen gather near Kabul to pledge their allegiance to the Afghan government in preparation for a Taliban assault that is threatening to overwhelm major cities
Attacks were expected in the south and east – the Taliban’s traditional strongholds – but worryingly the group has also mounted daunting offensives in the north, where their control has historically been weak.
In a lighting offensive that began in May, the group has taken control of some 50 of the country’s 400 districts and is contesting dozens more according to monitoring group The Long War Journal.
By some estimates, the group is now in control of half the country. A recent US intelligence report warned they could retake Kabul, the capital, within six months.
In one recent battle in the district of Imam Sahib, 100 government troops faced off against 300 Taliban fighters in a two-day battle that ended with a decisive victory for the jihadists.
Locals reported bodies left lying in the streets alongside smouldering tanks, with homes and businesses destroyed.
It is just one of a series of victories that the Taliban have won in Afghanistan’s north, leaving them in control of key strategic border crossings with Tajikistan – a valuable trading route.
In some cases, the fighting has been fierce.
Another recent battle in Dawlat Abad district saw Sohrab Azimi – a well-known and much-respected government fighter – killed alongside 22 of his commandos after being sent into the hotly-contested area without proper backup.
But in others, government troops have given up with barely a shot fired – abandoning their posts or else surrendering after becoming surrounded with no hope of reinforcement.
Sohrab Azimi, a well-known and respected government commando who was recently killed in fierce fighting in Afghanistan’s north after he was sent into a hotly-contested area without backup
A man injured by a roadside bomb that blew up a passenger bus travelling from Kabul to Kandahar as Taliban fighters recapture territory near both cities
On the outskirts of Herat, Afghanistan’s third-largest city, Times journalist Anthony Loyd saw the Taliban advance firsthand as he headed out on patrol with government troops disguised as Taliban fighters.
They found their enemies just 16 miles south of the city, along the main highway – passing by a patrol who waved at them, mistaking them for some of their own.
On either side of the road, government outposts stood abandoned or else overrun by Taliban fighters who had raised their flag in victory.
Only one outpost still held government troops – nine men out of 90 the commander had started the battle with, the rest having been killed or run off.
He described how, for 48 hours, he had battled the Taliban with little ammunition, no armoured vehicles, no air support, and no chance of reinforcement.
‘Unless we get back-up and more ammunition I’m going to abandon the post too,’ he added.
Another fighter who gave his name as Mohammed Nasim, 33, described a month-long fight against the Taliban after his post was encircled – reduced to eating berries and grass while digging shrapnel out of his side with a knife before being rescued.
He said: ‘For 30 days I had thought I would die. When the commandos came for us, we stacked the dead and wounded on the fuselage floor of a helicopter, then ran over them to fit inside.
‘I had lost so many of my friends I felt like screaming.’
In response, a worried government this week launched what it called National Mobilization, arming local volunteers.
Observers say the move only resurrects militias that will be loyal to local commanders or powerful Kabul-allied warlords, who wrecked the Afghan capital during the inter-factional fighting of the 1990s and killed thousands of civilians.
‘The fact that the government has put out the call for the militias is a clear admission of the failure of the security forces … most certainly an act of desperation,’ said Bill Roggio, senior fellow at the U.S.-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
Roggio tracks militant groups and is editor of the foundation’s Long War Journal.
‘The Afghan military and police have abandoned numerous outposts, bases, and district centers, and it is difficult to imagine that these hastily organized militias can perform better than organized security forces,’ he said.
On Wednesday at Koh Daman on Kabul’s northern edge, dozens of armed villagers in one of the first National Mobilization militias gathered at a rally.
‘Death to criminals!’ and ‘Death to Taliban!’ they shouted, waving automatic rifles. Some had rocket propelled grenade launchers resting casually on their shoulders.
A handful of uniformed Afghan National Police officers watched. ‘We need them, we have no leadership, we have no help,’ said Moman, one of the policemen.
He criticized the Defense and Interior Ministries, saying they were stuffed with overpaid officials while the front-line troops receive little pay.
‘I’m the one standing here for 24 hours like this with all this equipment to defend my country,’ he said, indicating his weapons and vest jammed with ammunition.
‘But in the ministries, officials earn thousands’ of dollars. He spoke on condition he be identified only by his first name for fear of reprisals.
The other police standing nearby joined in with the criticism, others nodding in agreement. New recruits in the security forces get 12,000 Afghanis a month, about $152, with higher ranks getting the equivalent of about $380.
The U.S. and NATO have committed to paying $4 billion annually until 2024 to support the Afghanistan National Security and Defense Forces.
Still, even Washington’s official watchdog auditing spending says Afghan troops are disillusioned and demoralized with corruption rife throughout the government.
As the districts fell, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani swept through his Defense and Interior Ministries, appointing new senior leadership, including reinstating Bismillah Khan as defense minister.
Khan was previously removed for corruption, and his militias have been criticized for summary killings. They were also deeply involved in the brutal civil war that led to the Taliban’s takeover in 1996.
Afghan and international observers fear a similar conflict could erupt once more. During the 1990’s war, multiple warlords battled for power, nearly destroying Kabul and killing at least 50,000 people – mostly civilians – in the process.
Those warlords returned to power after the Taliban’s fall and have gained wealth and strength since.
They are jealous of their domains, deeply distrustful of each other, and their loyalties to Ghani are fluid.
Hundreds of militiamen shout ‘death to the Taliban’ as they join government forces in Kabul ahead of what is expected to be a major jihadist assault
Ethnic Uzbek warlord Rashid Dostum Uzbek, for example, violently ousted the president’s choice for governor of his Uzbek-controlled province of Faryab earlier this year.
A former adviser to the Afghan government, Torek Farhadi, called the national mobilization ‘a recipe for future generalized violence.’
He noted the government has promised to pay the militias, even as official security forces complain salaries are often delayed for months.
He predicted the same corruption would eat away at the funds meant for militias, and as a result ‘local commanders and warlords will quickly turn against him (Ghani) and we will have fiefdoms and chaos.’
That has left the Taliban expectant of victory, so much so that the group has started making diplomatic overtures to regional powers in the hope of cooperation if – they believe when – they seize power.
Earlier this week, a senior official even confirmed the group were in talks with India – a country that has long been opposed to the Taliban because of its close links with hated rival Pakistan.
‘The meeting was held on India’s request,’ a Taliban official said. ‘The Indians have concerns . . . and requested that the Taliban should not support [militant] elements who are anti-India.
‘We have our independent policy towards all countries. We respect our friends — but that doesn’t mean we will not talk to the countries that have problematic relationships with our friends.’
Source: Read Full Article